Where is Abaloparatide being studied?

Find registered human studies, phases, products, recruitment status and reported research locations around the world. Registry search matches are separate from this profile’s reviewed evidence.

Scientific intelligence record

Experience 2.0

PTHrP analog

Abaloparatide

Abaloparatide is a synthetic 34-residue analog of human parathyroid hormone-related protein, PTHrP(1–34), designed to activate the parathyroid hormone type 1 receptor. Intermittent subcutaneous exposure produces an osteoanabolic response by stimulating osteoblast activity and increasing bone formation. The molecule contains an α-aminoisobutyric-acid substitution and is distinct from endogenous PTHrP and from teriparatide. Regulatory authorization is product- and jurisdiction-specific: the FDA-approved TYMLOS label covers defined high-fracture-risk postmenopausal women and men, while the EMA-authorized ELADYNOS indication is for postmenopausal women at increased fracture risk.

Record status

Traceability partial

Last meaningful update: 9/20/2026

Evidence searched through:
Not recorded
Assessment updated:
9/20/2026
Documented human review:
9/20/2026
Automated scientific assessment:
None recorded
AI source check:
9/26/2026

Published source links and profile text pass separate gates. Only a documented human review is labelled as human review; an automated scientific assessment applies deterministic checks, and an AI source check confirms only that a source exists and matches its identifiers. A source count alone does not establish a review.

Evidence coverage has three distinct layers. The corpus count is a transparent screening inventory, the featured set contains study-level tiering and interpretation, and the published-source count contains records promoted through the institutional publication workflow. Source validation, editorial publication, and scientific appraisal are separate decisions; these numbers must not be merged.

Ranked research corpus

454

Categorized publications with provisional ranking; scientific review remains separate.

Featured tiered studies

0

Cornerstone publications with study-level interpretation, limitations, and tier disclosure.

Research domains

6

Clinical and scientific questions synthesized independently across the evidence atlas.

Published source records

25

Database records promoted through the governed publication workflow—not the corpus total.

Corpus generated 2026-09-18. Counts remain separately labeled so screening is not represented as completed review.

Human experience · separate evidence stream

No community pattern is displayed yet

Eligible observations remain below the privacy and reliability threshold. WPF will not convert a handful of reports into a percentage, trend, or clinical claim.

Observation is valuable human context. It is not evidence of causation, efficacy, or safety.

Public display gate

n ≥ 20 eligible observations

Exact progress remains private before the threshold.

Intelligence snapshot

The state of the record

A compact view of what is represented, what remains unresolved, and how completely the record can be traced.

Ranked research corpus

454

Categorized screening records; proposed rankings remain pending human appraisal.

Featured tiered studies

0

Cornerstone studies with published study-level interpretation and tier disclosure.

Research domains

6

Independent evidence dossiers covering the major research questions.

Published source records

25

Source records published through the governed workflow; this count does not certify scientific conclusions.

Contradictions

0

Conflicting evidence relationships that remain visible.

Research gaps

1

Questions the current record identifies as unresolved.

Connected media

0

Media records explicitly linked to this scientific record.

What we know

Evidence, claims, and boundaries

The project separates represented evidence from qualification, contradiction, uncertainty, and what the evidence does not establish.

Reconciled domain conclusions

6 published domain syntheses connected to 0 featured studies

Abaloparatide no longer relies on the legacy “no public claim” state. Each research domain publishes a bounded synthesis, confidence level, evidence context, limitations, geographic applicability, regulatory interpretation, and research gaps. Publication of these syntheses is separate from the scientific review status shown above.

Inspect the reconciled evidence atlas
Inspect the published evidence record25 governed records · titles, provenance, and original-source linksOpen records ↓
2020Phase 3 human evidence
Evidence strength A · 90/100 · ProvisionalHow this is rated

This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.

Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.

Directness
80/100
Replication
65/100

Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.

Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0

Effect of Abaloparatide vs Alendronate on Fracture Risk Reduction in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis.

The ACTIVE study demonstrated the antifracture efficacy of abaloparatide in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Authors
Benjamin Z Leder, Bruce Mitlak, Ming-Yi Hu, Gary Hattersley, Richard S Bockman
Source
The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism
DOI
10.1210/clinem/dgz162
PubMed
31674644
Open original source
2016Phase 3 human evidence
Evidence strength A · 90/100 · ProvisionalHow this is rated

This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.

Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.

Directness
80/100
Replication
65/100

Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.

Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0

Effect of Abaloparatide vs Placebo on New Vertebral Fractures in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Additional therapies are needed for prevention of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors
Paul D Miller, Gary Hattersley, Bente Juel Riis, Gregory C Williams, Edith Lau, Luis Augusto Russo, Peter Alexandersen, Cristiano A F Zerbini, Ming-yi Hu, Alan G Harris, Lorraine A Fitzpatrick, Felicia Cosman
Source
JAMA
DOI
10.1001/jama.2016.11136
PubMed
27533157
Open original source
2017Phase 3 human evidence
Evidence strength A · 90/100 · ProvisionalHow this is rated

This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.

Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.

Directness
80/100
Replication
65/100

Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.

Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0

Effects of abaloparatide-SC (BA058) on bone histology and histomorphometry: The ACTIVE phase 3 trial.

There are a number of effective treatments for osteoporosis but most are in the antiresorptive class of compounds.

Authors
Carolina A Moreira, Lorraine A Fitzpatrick, Yamei Wang, Robert R Recker
Source
Bone
DOI
10.1016/j.bone.2016.11.004
PubMed
27826127
Open original source
2023Phase 3 human evidence
Evidence strength A · 90/100 · ProvisionalHow this is rated

This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.

Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.

Directness
80/100
Replication
65/100

Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.

Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0

The effects of abaloparatide on hip geometry and biomechanical properties in Japanese osteoporotic patients assessed using DXA-based hip structural analysis: results of the Japanese phase 3 ACTIVE-J trial.

Daily subcutaneous injection of 80 μg abaloparatide increased bone mineral density in Japanese patients with osteoporosis at high fracture risk in the ACTIVE-J trial.

Authors
Teruki Sone, Kazuhiro Ohnaru, Takumi Sugai, Akiko Yamashita, Nobukazu Okimoto, Tetsuo Inoue, Toshio Matsumoto
Source
Archives of osteoporosis
DOI
10.1007/s11657-023-01344-5
PubMed
38030806
Open original source
2025Phase 3 human evidence
Evidence strength A · 90/100 · ProvisionalHow this is rated

This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.

Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.

Directness
80/100
Replication
65/100

Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.

Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0

Bone turnover markers predict changes in bone mineral density in men treated with abaloparatide: results from the abaloparatide for the treatment of men with osteoporosis (ATOM) study.

Early increases in bone turnover markers (BTMs) in response to anabolic therapy correlate with 18-mo BMD increases in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis; however, this relationship has not been assessed in men.

Authors
Richard Eastell, Jacques P Brown, Robert A Adler, E Michael Lewiecki, Neil Binkley, Eric S Orwoll, David Kendler, Bruce H Mitlak, Yamei Wang
Source
Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research
DOI
10.1093/jbmr/zjaf003
PubMed
39791502
Open original source
2024Phase 3 human evidence
Evidence strength A · 90/100 · ProvisionalHow this is rated

This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.

Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.

Directness
80/100
Replication
65/100

Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.

Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0

Effects of Abaloparatide on Bone Mineral Density in Proximal Femoral Regions Corresponding to Arthroplasty Gruen Zones: A Study of Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis.

Low hip bone mineral density (BMD) in patients who undergo total hip arthroplasty (THA) increases the risk of periprosthetic fractures, implant instability, and other complications.

Authors
Neil P Sheth, James Russell Smith, Renaud Winzenrieth, Ludovic Humbert, Yamei Wang, John I Boxberger, Mathias P Bostrom
Source
The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume
DOI
10.2106/jbjs.23.01334
PubMed
38691582
Open original source
2022Phase 1–2 human evidence
Evidence strength B · 80/100 · ProvisionalHow this is rated

This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.

Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.

Directness
80/100
Replication
65/100

Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.

Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0

The Efficacy and Safety of Abaloparatide-SC in Men With Osteoporosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Abaloparatide significantly increased bone mineral density (BMD) in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis and decreased risk of vertebral, nonvertebral, and clinical fractures compared with placebo.

Authors
Edward Czerwinski, Jose Cardona, Rafal Plebanski, Chris Recknor, Tamara Vokes, Kenneth G Saag, Neil Binkley, E Michael Lewiecki, Jonathan Adachi, Dorota Knychas, David Kendler, Eric Orwoll
Source
Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research
DOI
10.1002/jbmr.4719
PubMed
36190391
Open original source
2018Phase 1–2 human evidence
Evidence strength B · 80/100 · ProvisionalHow this is rated

This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.

Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.

Directness
80/100
Replication
65/100

Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.

Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0

ACTIVExtend: 24 Months of Alendronate After 18 Months of Abaloparatide or Placebo for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis.

In women with postmenopausal osteoporosis, we investigated the effects of 24 months of treatment with alendronate (ALN) following 18 months of treatment with abaloparatide (ABL) or placebo (PBO).

Authors
Henry G Bone, Felicia Cosman, Paul D Miller, Gregory C Williams, Gary Hattersley, Ming-Yi Hu, Lorraine A Fitzpatrick, Bruce Mitlak, Socrates Papapoulos, René Rizzoli, Robin K Dore, John P Bilezikian
Source
The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism
DOI
10.1210/jc.2018-00163
PubMed
29800372
Open original source
2025Phase 1–2 human evidence
Evidence strength B · 80/100 · ProvisionalHow this is rated

This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.

Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.

Directness
80/100
Replication
65/100

Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.

Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0

Probability of achieving bone mineral density treatment targets with abaloparatide and teriparatide.

The goal of treatment for women at high risk of fracture who have a T-score ≤-2.5 is to mitigate fracture risk by achieving T-scores at least above -2.5.

Authors
Felicia Cosman, Bruce H Mitlak, Yamei Wang, Leny Pearman, Carolina A Moreira, E Michael Lewiecki, Steven R Cummings
Source
Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research
DOI
10.1093/jbmr/zjaf053
PubMed
40214193
Open original source
2023Phase 1–2 human evidence
Evidence strength B · 80/100 · ProvisionalHow this is rated

This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.

Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.

Directness
80/100
Replication
65/100

Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.

Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0

Abaloparatide dose-dependently increases bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a phase 2 study.

This study aimed to determine the efficacy of abaloparatide in increasing bone mineral density (BMD) and its safety in postmenopausal Japanese women with osteoporosis.

Authors
Toshio Matsumoto, Teruki Sone, Akiko Yamashita, Tetsuo Inoue
Source
Journal of bone and mineral metabolism
DOI
10.1007/s00774-023-01455-6
PubMed
37505256
Open original source
2023Phase 1–2 human evidence
Evidence strength B · 80/100 · ProvisionalHow this is rated

This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.

Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.

Directness
80/100
Replication
65/100

Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.

Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0

Efficacy and Safety of Transdermal Abaloparatide in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis: A Randomized Study.

Anabolic therapies, recommended for patients at very high fracture risk, are administered subcutaneously (SC).

Authors
E Michael Lewiecki, Edward Czerwinski, Chris Recknor, Anna Strzelecka, Guillermo Valenzuela, Mary Lawrence, Stuart Silverman, Jose Cardona, Susan M Nattrass, Neil Binkley, Miriam Annett, Leny Pearman
Source
Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research
DOI
10.1002/jbmr.4877
PubMed
37417725
Open original source
2017Observational human evidence
Evidence strength B · 70/100 · ProvisionalHow this is rated

This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.

Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.

Directness
80/100
Replication
65/100

Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.

Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0

Profile of Abaloparatide and Its Potential in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis.

Abaloparatide (previously known as BA058) is a synthetic 34-amino acid peptide and novel selective activator of parathyroid hormone receptor 1 (PTHR1) currently under development as a new anabolic agent in the management of osteoporosis.

Authors
Sri Harsha Tella, Anuhya Kommalapati, Ricardo Correa
Source
Cureus
DOI
10.7759/cureus.1300
PubMed
28680788
Open original source
2017Observational human evidence
Evidence strength C · 65/100 · ProvisionalHow this is rated

This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.

Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.

Directness
80/100
Replication
65/100

Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.

Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0

Abaloparatide: First Global Approval.

Abaloparatide (Tymlos™) is a synthetic peptide analogue of human parathyroid hormone-related protein that was developed by Radius Health as an osteoanabolic agent for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors
Matt Shirley
Source
Drugs
DOI
10.1007/s40265-017-0780-7
PubMed
28624872
Open original source
2023Observational human evidence
Evidence strength A · 88/100 · ProvisionalHow this is rated

This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.

Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.

Directness
65/100
Replication
65/100

Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.

Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0

Evidence for the cardiovascular effects of osteoporosis treatments in randomized trials of post-menopausal women: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Osteoporosis medications have been reported to have beneficial and harmful cardiovascular effects.

Authors
Alexander H Seeto, Mina Tadrous, Abadi K Gebre, Joshua R Lewis, Howard A Fink, Peter R Ebeling, Alexander J Rodríguez
Source
Bone
DOI
10.1016/j.bone.2022.116610
PubMed
36372197
Open original source
2023Observational human evidence

Fracture risk reduction and safety by osteoporosis treatment compared with placebo or active comparator in postmenopausal women: systematic review, network meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis of randomised clinical trials.

To review the comparative effectiveness of osteoporosis treatments, including the bone anabolic agents, abaloparatide and romosozumab, on reducing the risk of fractures in postmenopausal women, and to characterise the effect of antiosteoporosis drug treatments on the risk of fractures according to baseline risk factors.

Authors
Mina Nicole Händel, Isabel Cardoso, Cecilie von Bülow, Jeanett Friis Rohde, Anja Ussing, Sabrina Mai Nielsen, Robin Christensen, Jean-Jacques Body, Maria Luisa Brandi, Adolfo Diez-Perez, Peyman Hadji, Muhammad Kassim Javaid
Source
BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
DOI
10.1136/bmj-2021-068033
PubMed
37130601
Open original source
2025Observational human evidence
Evidence strength B · 76/100 · ProvisionalHow this is rated

This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.

Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.

Directness
80/100
Replication
65/100

Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.

Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0

Comparative Effectiveness of Abaloparatide and Teriparatide in Women 50 Years of Age and Older: Update of a Real-World Retrospective Analysis.

Abaloparatide and teriparatide are osteoanabolic treatments indicated for postmenopausal women and men with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture.

Authors
Laila Tabatabai, Felicia Cosman, Jeffrey R Curtis, Kristi T DeSapri, Clayton T LaBaume, Jean-Yves Reginster, René Rizzoli, Bernard Cortet, Yamei Wang, Joseph Chiodo, Bruce H Mitlak
Source
Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists
DOI
10.1016/j.eprac.2024.10.017
PubMed
39551187
Open original source
2024Observational human evidence
Evidence strength A · 88/100 · ProvisionalHow this is rated

This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.

Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.

Directness
80/100
Replication
65/100

Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.

Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0

The Safety and Efficacy of Abaloparatide on Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

The aging of the population increases the incidence of postmenopausal osteoporosis, which threatens the health of elderly women.

Authors
Fuxin Xu, Yurun Wang, Xinjian Zhu
Source
Clinical therapeutics
DOI
10.1016/j.clinthera.2023.12.010
PubMed
38307725
Open original source
2025Observational human evidence
Evidence strength A · 88/100 · ProvisionalHow this is rated

This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.

Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.

Directness
65/100
Replication
65/100

Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.

Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0

PTH1 receptor agonists for fracture risk: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Osteoporosis, defined by reduced bone mineral density and macro- and micro-architectural degradation, leads to increased fracture risk, particularly in aging populations.

Authors
Charlotte Beaudart, Nicola Veronese, Jonathan Douxfils, Jotheeswaran Amuthavalli Thiyagarajan, Francesco Bolzetta, Paolo Albanese, Gianpaolo Voltan, Majed Alokail, Nicholas C Harvey, Nicholas R Fuggle, Olivier Bruyère, René Rizzoli
Source
Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA
DOI
10.1007/s00198-025-07440-1
PubMed
40047881
Open original source
2019Observational human evidence
Evidence strength A · 88/100 · ProvisionalHow this is rated

This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.

Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.

Directness
65/100
Replication
65/100

Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.

Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0

Efficacy of Pharmacological Therapies for the Prevention of Fractures in Postmenopausal Women: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Osteoporosis and osteopenia are associated with increased fracture incidence in postmenopausal women.

Authors
Patricia Barrionuevo, Ekta Kapoor, Noor Asi, Fares Alahdab, Khaled Mohammed, Khalid Benkhadra, Jehad Almasri, Wigdan Farah, Maria Sarigianni, Kalpana Muthusamy, Alaa Al Nofal, Qusay Haydour
Source
The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism
DOI
10.1210/jc.2019-00192
PubMed
30907957
Open original source
2023Observational human evidence

Effectiveness and Safety of Treatments to Prevent Fractures in People With Low Bone Mass or Primary Osteoporosis: A Living Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis for the American College of Physicians.

The prevalence of osteoporosis is increasing in the United States.

Authors
Chelsea Ayers, Devan Kansagara, Brittany Lazur, Rongwei Fu, Amy Kwon, Curtis Harrod
Source
Annals of internal medicine
DOI
10.7326/m22-0684
PubMed
36592455
Open original source
2021Observational human evidence
Evidence strength B · 70/100 · ProvisionalHow this is rated

This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.

Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.

Directness
80/100
Replication
65/100

Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.

Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0

Abaloparatide: A review of preclinical and clinical studies.

Osteoporosis is a debilitating disease characterized by reduced bone mineral density and an increased risk of fractures.

Authors
Mikkel Bo Brent
Source
European journal of pharmacology
DOI
10.1016/j.ejphar.2021.174409
PubMed
34364879
Open original source
2019Observational human evidence
Evidence strength C · 70/100 · ProvisionalHow this is rated

This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.

Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.

Directness
80/100
Replication
65/100

Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.

Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0

Abaloparatide, the second generation osteoanabolic drug: Molecular mechanisms underlying its advantages over the first-in-class teriparatide.

Abaloparatide is an analog of human parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP) that has recently been approved for the treatment of post-menopausal osteoporosis.

Authors
Sharmistha Bhattacharyya, Subhashis Pal, Naibedya Chattopadhyay
Source
Biochemical pharmacology
DOI
10.1016/j.bcp.2019.05.024
PubMed
31136739
Open original source
2019Observational human evidence
Evidence strength C · 70/100 · ProvisionalHow this is rated

This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.

Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.

Directness
80/100
Replication
65/100

Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.

Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0

Abaloparatide: A new pharmacological option for osteoporosis.

The efficacy and safety of abaloparatide, a parathyroid hormone-related protein analog for the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women at high fracture risk, is reviewed.

Authors
Allyson Sleeman, Jennifer N Clements
Source
American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists
DOI
10.1093/ajhp/zxy022
PubMed
30689744
Open original source
2018Observational human evidence
Evidence strength C · 70/100 · ProvisionalHow this is rated

This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.

Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.

Directness
80/100
Replication
65/100

Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.

Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0

Abaloparatide: Review of a Next-Generation Parathyroid Hormone Agonist.

To review the efficacy, safety, and economics of abaloparatide in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors
Eric G Boyce, Yvonne Mai, Christopher Pham
Source
The Annals of pharmacotherapy
DOI
10.1177/1060028017748649
PubMed
29241341
Open original source
2019Laboratory research
Evidence strength C · 62/100 · ProvisionalHow this is rated

This score estimates how strongly this source can support scientific claims. It is not a prestige score, and the grade does not transfer automatically to every claim that cites the source.

Grade guide: A+/A is the strongest represented support; B+/B is substantial but qualified; C is limited, indirect, observational, or preclinical; D/E is weak, mechanistic-only, anecdotal, or insufficient.

Directness
80/100
Replication
65/100

Provisional ratings are automated baselines from structured metadata. They are not completed full-text risk-of-bias reviews and may change after editorial assessment.

Methodology: WPF-ESR-1.0

Precisely Controlled Delivery of Abaloparatide through Injectable Hydrogel to Promote Bone Regeneration.

Side-effects from allograft, limited bone stock, and site morbidity from autograft are the major challenges to traditional bone defect treatments.

Authors
Ziyu Ning, Baoyu Tan, Bo Chen, Dzi Shing Aaron Lau, Tak Man Wong, Tianhao Sun, Songlin Peng, Zhaoyang Li, William Weijia Lu
Source
Macromolecular bioscience
DOI
10.1002/mabi.201900020
PubMed
31066995
Open original source

Scientific context

Chemistry and represented biological context

Existing reviewed chemistry is preserved as scientific context. Chemistry and mechanism information do not establish clinical efficacy or safety.

Open chemistry and biological context ↓
Chemical identity

Molecular and structural record

Structured record
Molecular formula
C174H300N56O49
Molecular weight (Da)
3961
Amino acid sequence
AVSEHQLLHDKGKSIQDLRRRELLEKLLXKLHTA-NH2
InChIKey
BVISQZFBLRSESR-XSCWXTNMSA-N

Chemical identity describes the recorded molecular information. It does not establish biological activity, clinical efficacy, safety, or therapeutic suitability.

Research

How the scientific record is developing

Chronology, unresolved research questions, opportunities, and researcher activity remain descriptive rather than evaluative.

Research chronology

  1. 2016 · study · Temporal status not established

    Effect of Abaloparatide vs Placebo on New Vertebral Fractures in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

    JAMA

  2. 2017 · study · Temporal status not established

    Effects of abaloparatide-SC (BA058) on bone histology and histomorphometry: The ACTIVE phase 3 trial.

    Bone

  3. 2017 · study · Temporal status not established

    Profile of Abaloparatide and Its Potential in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis.

    Cureus

  4. 2017 · study · Temporal status not established

    Abaloparatide: First Global Approval.

    Drugs

  5. 2018 · study · Temporal status not established

    ACTIVExtend: 24 Months of Alendronate After 18 Months of Abaloparatide or Placebo for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis.

    The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism

  6. 2018 · study · Temporal status not established

    Abaloparatide: Review of a Next-Generation Parathyroid Hormone Agonist.

    The Annals of pharmacotherapy

  7. 2019 · study · Temporal status not established

    Efficacy of Pharmacological Therapies for the Prevention of Fractures in Postmenopausal Women: A Network Meta-Analysis.

    The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism

  8. 2019 · study · Temporal status not established

    Abaloparatide, the second generation osteoanabolic drug: Molecular mechanisms underlying its advantages over the first-in-class teriparatide.

    Biochemical pharmacology

  9. 2019 · study · Temporal status not established

    Abaloparatide: A new pharmacological option for osteoporosis.

    American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists

  10. 2019 · study · Temporal status not established

    Precisely Controlled Delivery of Abaloparatide through Injectable Hydrogel to Promote Bone Regeneration.

    Macromolecular bioscience

  11. 2020 · study · Temporal status not established

    Effect of Abaloparatide vs Alendronate on Fracture Risk Reduction in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis.

    The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism

  12. 2021 · study · Temporal status not established

    Abaloparatide: A review of preclinical and clinical studies.

    European journal of pharmacology

  13. 2022 · study · Temporal status not established

    The Efficacy and Safety of Abaloparatide-SC in Men With Osteoporosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research

  14. 2023 · study · Temporal status not established

    The effects of abaloparatide on hip geometry and biomechanical properties in Japanese osteoporotic patients assessed using DXA-based hip structural analysis: results of the Japanese phase 3 ACTIVE-J trial.

    Archives of osteoporosis

  15. 2023 · study · Temporal status not established

    Abaloparatide dose-dependently increases bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a phase 2 study.

    Journal of bone and mineral metabolism

  16. 2023 · study · Temporal status not established

    Efficacy and Safety of Transdermal Abaloparatide in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis: A Randomized Study.

    Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research

  17. 2023 · study · Temporal status not established

    Evidence for the cardiovascular effects of osteoporosis treatments in randomized trials of post-menopausal women: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.

    Bone

  18. 2023 · study · Temporal status not established

    Fracture risk reduction and safety by osteoporosis treatment compared with placebo or active comparator in postmenopausal women: systematic review, network meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis of randomised clinical trials.

    BMJ (Clinical research ed.)

  19. 2023 · study · Temporal status not established

    Effectiveness and Safety of Treatments to Prevent Fractures in People With Low Bone Mass or Primary Osteoporosis: A Living Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis for the American College of Physicians.

    Annals of internal medicine

  20. 2024 · study · Temporal status not established

    Effects of Abaloparatide on Bone Mineral Density in Proximal Femoral Regions Corresponding to Arthroplasty Gruen Zones: A Study of Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis.

    The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume

  21. 2024 · study · Temporal status not established

    The Safety and Efficacy of Abaloparatide on Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

    Clinical therapeutics

  22. 2025 · study · Temporal status not established

    Bone turnover markers predict changes in bone mineral density in men treated with abaloparatide: results from the abaloparatide for the treatment of men with osteoporosis (ATOM) study.

    Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research

  23. 2025 · study · Temporal status not established

    Probability of achieving bone mineral density treatment targets with abaloparatide and teriparatide.

    Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research

  24. 2025 · study · Temporal status not established

    Comparative Effectiveness of Abaloparatide and Teriparatide in Women 50 Years of Age and Older: Update of a Real-World Retrospective Analysis.

    Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists

  25. 2025 · study · Temporal status not established

    PTH1 receptor agonists for fracture risk: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

    Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA

  26. 2026 · regulatory · Temporal status not established

    Regulatory review: approved

    European Union (EMA)

  27. 2026 · regulatory · Temporal status not established

    Regulatory review: approved

    United States (FDA)

The represented chronology reflects records currently included in the governed dataset and does not claim to represent the entire scientific literature.

What still needs investigation

Claim traceability

No institutional claim record is currently represented for this peptide.

Evidence is missing or not represented as studied; this is not a conclusion that the intervention does not work.

Researchers represented in the evidence record12 bibliographic identities · open to inspect

These are bibliographic author identities derived from represented records. Name strings are not proof of unique real-world researcher identity, and publishing organizations are not treated as institutional affiliations.

E Michael Lewiecki

4 represented evidence records

Years represented: 2022, 2023, 2025

Publishing organizations appearing in records: Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research

Felicia Cosman

4 represented evidence records

Years represented: 2016, 2018, 2025

Publishing organizations appearing in records: Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, JAMA, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism

Gary Hattersley

3 represented evidence records

Years represented: 2016, 2018, 2020

Publishing organizations appearing in records: JAMA, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism

Lorraine A Fitzpatrick

3 represented evidence records

Years represented: 2016, 2017, 2018

Publishing organizations appearing in records: Bone, JAMA, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism

Ming-Yi Hu

3 represented evidence records

Years represented: 2016, 2018, 2020

Publishing organizations appearing in records: JAMA, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism

Neil Binkley

3 represented evidence records

Years represented: 2022, 2023, 2025

Publishing organizations appearing in records: Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research

Yamei Wang

5 represented evidence records

Years represented: 2017, 2024, 2025

Publishing organizations appearing in records: Bone, Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume

Bruce Mitlak

2 represented evidence records

Years represented: 2018, 2020

Publishing organizations appearing in records: The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism

Carolina A Moreira

2 represented evidence records

Years represented: 2017, 2025

Publishing organizations appearing in records: Bone, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research

Chris Recknor

2 represented evidence records

Years represented: 2022, 2023

Publishing organizations appearing in records: Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research

David Kendler

2 represented evidence records

Years represented: 2022, 2025

Publishing organizations appearing in records: Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research

Edward Czerwinski

2 represented evidence records

Years represented: 2022, 2023

Publishing organizations appearing in records: Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research

Connections

Follow the scientific relationships

Connections appear only when they are represented by the project’s underlying records.

Open 12 represented connections ↓

institution

Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research

represented evidence source

institution

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism

represented evidence source

institution

Bone

represented evidence source

institution

JAMA

represented evidence source

institution

Archives of osteoporosis

represented evidence source

institution

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume

represented evidence source

institution

Journal of bone and mineral metabolism

represented evidence source

institution

Cureus

represented evidence source

institution

Drugs

represented evidence source

institution

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)

represented evidence source

institution

Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists

represented evidence source

institution

Clinical therapeutics

represented evidence source

Traceability

Follow the record back to its source

The experience makes incomplete links visible instead of presenting a false impression of perfect provenance.

Source publication state

A governed source may be verified and approved for publication while its claim-to-evidence link is still incomplete.

Reviewer provenance state

“Human scientist reviewed: no” means that specific source-path attribution is not recorded. It does not silently negate the separate publication-review state.

Domain conclusion → Evidence

Connected

Evidence → Source

Connected

Source → Original record

Connected

Traceability documents how the project connects statements to records. It does not establish that a source is scientifically valid or that a claim is clinically true.

Reconciled for 6 domain conclusions and 0 featured studies.

Detailed study-to-domain mappings and original-source paths appear in the Abaloparatide evidence-governance section.

Inspect the ranked source records

Observational archive

What contributors reported

Observational archive data is intentionally separated from published scientific evidence.

Observational boundary

Insufficient eligible observations are available for display under the current filters.

Insufficient eligible observations are currently represented to display aggregated findings for this peptide.

Regulatory context

Published jurisdictional records

Regulatory status is jurisdiction-specific and time-dependent. It is presented as context, not as a recommendation for use or a substitute for scientific evidence evaluation.

Research + media

Media connected to this scientific record

Only media explicitly linked through the project’s relationship system appears here.

No scientifically connected media is currently represented for this peptide.

Sources + provenance

Read the scientific record with its boundaries intact

The public record organizes reviewed evidence; it does not establish scientific truth by itself.
Association, mechanism, observation and regulatory status must not be represented as proof of clinical efficacy or safety.
Observational reports describe contributor experiences and cannot establish causation, effectiveness, safety or clinical benefit.
Contradictory and qualifying evidence must remain visible rather than being silently discarded.
Absence of represented evidence is not evidence that research does not exist.
Research gaps identify unresolved questions; they are not negative conclusions.
Regulatory status is distinct from scientific evidence quality.
Media relationships provide context and explanation; they do not increase the strength of scientific evidence.
A section with no represented records is an incomplete project record, not a scientific conclusion.
Researcher and institutional relationships are shown only when supported by represented records and must not be interpreted as rankings or endorsements.

Generated: 11/8/2026, 5:24:49 PM

global evidence atlas

Abaloparatide research, ranked and separated by purpose

This is a deduplicated literature screening registry—not a claim that every mention directly proves efficacy or safety. Machine proposals remain visibly separate from governed human appraisal.

454Discoverable source universe
454Ranked screening records
6Research domains
0Accountably approved conclusions

454 matching records · ranked 2026-09-18

Page 1 of 19

#22Proposed tier Unassignedpreclinical animalAwaiting human appraisal

Hip Fractures: A Review.

Europe PMC · 2026 · PMID 42461643 · DOI 10.1001/jama.2026.11895

preclinical-animal

Count reconciliation: 454 discoverable source records match the peptide identity query; 454 are retained in this bounded, ranked screening view; 0 belong to the separate governed layer labeled “Accountably approved conclusions.” Domain totals overlap because one publication may inform several questions.

governance and regulatory context

Abaloparatide: what this atlas does and does not establish

Last checked
2026-09-18
Accountable publication approval
Not yet approved by a named accountable reviewer. Machine screening only.

No new outcome conclusion is inferred from discovery metadata. Named accountable approval is required for governed scientific conclusions.

Regulatory status by jurisdiction

Absence of a record in this pass is not proof that no authorization exists. Status must remain jurisdiction-, product-, formulation-, and date-specific.

  • European Union (EMA)approvedchecked 2026-09-09

    ELADYNOS (abaloparatide) is centrally authorised in the European Union for treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women at increased risk of fracture.

    EMA EPAR — Eladynos (EMEA/H/C/005928)
  • United States (FDA)approvedchecked 2026-09-09

    TYMLOS (abaloparatide) is FDA-approved for treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis at high risk for fracture or who have failed or are intolerant to other available osteoporosis therapy, and to increase bone density in men with osteoporosis at high risk for fracture or with the same treatment-history criteria.

    FDA Drugs@FDA NDA 208743 and TYMLOS Prescribing Information, revised August 2026

1 FDA structured product label record(s) were identified for this compound name in openFDA. Label presence reflects an approved product exists under that name; it is not a claim about the specific formulation, dose, or use being discussed anywhere else on this page.

No machine-proposed evidence-strength grades exist yet for this compound; all screening records are unassigned pending further review.

Abaloparatide evidence · ranking key

How evidence is ranked

A tier describes the evidentiary role and design strength of a source. It is not a popularity score, proof that every conclusion is correct, or a substitute for claim-level review.

A

Practice-defining evidence

Large, well-conducted randomized trials; prespecified major outcomes; rigorous systematic reviews or meta-analyses; and major regulatory assessments.

B

Strong supporting evidence

Smaller randomized trials, strong prospective cohorts, prespecified secondary analyses, and high-quality comparative-effectiveness studies.

C

Contextual evidence

Retrospective cohorts, claims-database studies, pharmacovigilance analyses, mechanistic human research, and well-documented case series.

D

Signal-generating evidence

Case reports, conference abstracts, preclinical research, hypothesis-generating analyses, and expert commentary.

Tier and confidence answer different questions

Tier classifies source design and evidentiary role. Confidence reflects risk of bias, sample size, comparator quality, outcome relevance, follow-up, missing data, directness, replication, reporting quality, and whether conclusions stay within the measured results.

Funding and conflicts are disclosed and considered, but sponsorship never automatically changes a tier. Corrections, retractions, and expressions of concern override the original rating.

peptide explorer

Structural visualization and provenance

Evidence-class labeling remains visible even when interactive rendering is unavailable. Representative geometry is not an experimentally determined or predicted biological conformation.

Fully specified molecular identity

Molecular formula
C174H300N56O49
Molecular weight
3961 g/mol
Exact identity / sequence notation
Ala-Val-Ser-Glu-His-Gln-Leu-Leu-His-Asp-Lys-Gly-Lys-Ser-Ile-Gln-Asp-Leu-Arg-Arg-Arg-Glu-Leu-Leu-Glu-Lys-Leu-Leu-X-Lys-Leu-His-Thr-Ala-NH2
Identity-defining modifications
  • 34-residue PTHrP analog
  • Non-standard residue retained as X in viewer
  • C-terminal amide
PubChem CID
76943386
InChIKey
BVISQZFBLRSESR-XSCWXTNMSA-N

Complete registered analog identity; viewer geometry is representative only.

Sources: NIH PubChem — Abaloparatide · reviewed 2026-09-17

Representative sequence-derived model
Structure source
Generated from this record's governed amino-acid sequence
Identifier
Not applicable — not a database structure
Method
Schematic layout ordered by residue position only; not a molecular-dynamics, homology, or fold prediction
Confidence / limitations
Illustrative only. Not physically accurate; carries no structural, binding-site, or activity meaning.
Provenance
WPF governed PeptideChemistry record
Retrieved / last reviewed
2026-09-17

This is a representative, sequence-derived model ordered by residue position only. It is not the peptide's experimentally determined or predicted biological conformation, and it carries no claim about real bond angles, distances, secondary structure, binding sites, or activity.

Suggested citation

  • APA

    World Peptide Foundation. (n.d.). Abaloparatide — Peptide Scientific Intelligence. World Peptide Foundation. (Reviewed September 20, 2026.) https://www.worldpeptidefoundation.org/directory/abaloparatide

  • AMA / Vancouver

    World Peptide Foundation. Abaloparatide — Peptide Scientific Intelligence. World Peptide Foundation website. Reviewed September 20, 2026. https://www.worldpeptidefoundation.org/directory/abaloparatide